By Janice Hardy, @Janice_Hardy
Multiple points of view offers advantages that a single point of view can't provide (be it first or third person). It allows you to follow multiple characters, show events happening in multiple locations, show comparisons, and tell the parts of the story a single POV isn't privy to.
Multiple points of view offers advantages that a single point of view can't provide (be it first or third person). It allows you to follow multiple characters, show events happening in multiple locations, show comparisons, and tell the parts of the story a single POV isn't privy to.
However, there are also pitfalls the single POV doesn't face. Multiple POVs means multiple storylines, and it's easy for each POV character to suddenly feel as if they have their own book. Several storylines can become a mish-mash of plots that don't connect well, or don't do any of the storylines justice because there's not enough time to flesh out all those plots.
Some things to remember if you're writing multiple third person point of view:
Your Characters Aren't in This Alone
Keeping an eye out for whose story affects the protagonists' story will make it a lot easier to see how various storylines fit together. It's not just about a few characters having an adventure, it's about how those adventures create people and situations that are going to collide at some point and resolve your core conflict. Maybe it'll be for the good, maybe it won't, but it'll be interesting.
- What does this character need from the other POV characters?
- How do these POV storylines affect each other?
- Where are the conflicts between the POVs? Where do they overlap or interact?
- Are the POVs aware of each other?
They Can Help Each Other, Even if They're Not Close
Call it the butterfly effect, but if one character does something in one place, that can affect a POV character in another location. And watching all those separate strands slowly braid themselves together is a great way to hook the reader. Even if readers can't see what the connections mean yet, they'll see the effects happening and will eagerly anticipate how they'll all relate.
- What happens in this POV that will affect the other POVs?
- What happens in the other POVs that affects this POV?
- What actions hinder another POV?
The Bigger Picture Affects More Than Just One Character
Events have far-reaching consequences that can help and hinder your POVs. One thing can force everyone to change their plans, which is an effective way to nudge them all toward a similar goal or story arc. It can also reinforce that this isn't several stories in one, it's several characters working toward one larger goal.
- What actions are critical to the core conflict and plot?
- What pieces are resolved in each POV?
- Who is responsible for resolving the core conflict? How do the other POVs help? (or hinder)
Multiple POVs can tell rich stories, but they can also try to do too much in one novel. Make sure your cast of characters are all working toward the same goal (even if one of them is working to stop that goal). They can all have different ways of getting there, but the core conflict affects them all.
Do you write in multiple POVs? What snags have you run into? What benefits have you found?
9 comments:
Interesting. I tried writing multiple third person POVs and just couldn't figure out whose POV the climax of the story should be in so I ended up rewriting it from scratch in a single POV :/ This post has given me a lot to think about...
I'm writing three povs at the moment. The hero, a minor character who has a small amount of book time, and the villain. I kinda like the multiple povs as they help you tell the story more linear.
Multiple POVs means multiple storylines
This really isn't always the case. I'm writing a shorter novella, approximately 25K, and I have three POVs. Hero, heroine, and the antagonist. There's only one plot. Each POV offers something towards that single plot line. There are two minor, minor subplots, but both support the main plot.
That's not to say the antagonist has many scenes told from her POV, there's two, maybe three, but they still support the main plot.
I think the biggest benefit is being able to impart information to the reader that main character/s can't or shouldn't know.
(I recently found your blog and really enjoy all your topics. Thanks for payinh it forward.)
Love your way of laying it out, Janice.
I am writing a YA adventure/romance from the hero's and heroine's POV. The first four chapters alternate as they are moving towards their "collision". They don't actually meet and speak until the fifth chapter. But in both POV, they are dreading a particular occasion and have already formed prejudices against the other participants that will be there.
In fact, I use a secondary character (who actually never has any "screen time") in both. This secondary character deeply wounded the heroine, making her suspicious and reactive. The hero has just come from that character's home and where that trouble maker spoke about the heroine in double edged compliments. This makes it easy for him to believe the worst of the heroine, making what could have been a meeting of like minds to a public verbal altercation. This sends the characters off on a winding plot road.
In that particular scene, I started it from the hero's POV, so the reader "gets" why he picks a fight. We can watch how her reactions just stirs up his anger more and convince him that his original assumptions were correct. But just when you think the argument is over and he's delivered his "last word", she laughs at him, the chapter ends and she picks up the story.
She gives her fake laugh to hide her hurt and anger and frustration at being falsely accused. Even though he knows there are people listening on the other room, she thinks they are alone. And with her feelings rushing onto the page, she changes tactics from defense to offense. This pushes her across the lines of protocol and manners.
This is an important turning point in the story, turning what should be allies into enemies. They now must work towards their goal separately making the journey more difficult (and interesting).
I really enjoy using multiple POV. There are always more perspectives and perceptions than your own. And that is what brings in so much of the conflict and plot into a story, I've found.
Thanks for the article. I'm really interested in multiple POV right now... it's tricky. Here's my question. If you're telling a mostly linear story from 4 different POVs should you always keep the order the same? Like character A's POV chapter/scene then B, C, D, then A, B C, D or is it okay to have character A and then skip to C after the pattern has been establish?
Xan, that could indicate a goal problem (though not always). There's a premise that needs to be resolved, but there's not a clear person with that goal driving the story. You might try looking to see who has the most to win/lose in the climax, and tweaking their goal or the core conflict to reflect that.
Traci, they are advantages to it :)
Jenna, storyline doesn't mean plot. It's just a storyline that follows that character. Those subplots are stories of their own in a way. If they're all connected and tied together that's great, but it's not uncommon for a multiple POV novel to have multiple plots as well.
And welcome to the blog! Good to have you.
Amelia, sounds great! I love how you have that third character to tie it all in together. I'm currently doing the hero/heroine dual POVs myself, and picking where to switch has been a lot of fun. (and a hassle at times!)
Liana, It's up to you. You can stay in a regular order, or you can switch as needed. One thing to watch out for though, is that you don't leave a POV out of the loop for too long. With so many POVs, it can be easy for the reader to forget about one if a lot of chapters pass without them.
“Make sure your cast of characters are all working toward the same goal (even if one of them is working to stop that goal).”
Does this mean each POV character must have the same story goal?
Do people prefer to use first or third person for multiple viewpoints? I'm considering a mixture -- first person for my main character and third person for the others.
Sam, not specifically, more like working toward the same core conflict. (I'll edit that so it's more clear). Take Lord of the Rings for example. The core conflict was the bad guy wanted to get the ring, the good guys wanted to destroy the ring. Every POV might have a different specific goal, but ultimately pretty much everything relates in some way to the ring conflict.
So whatever your core conflict is, the goals of the POV characters will relate to it in some way. If the core conflict is to stop a bank robbery, odds are if a POV is working on getting a new job or saving their marriage, and that doesn't affect the bank robbery at all in any way, it's probably going to feel extraneous. But if that subplot goal affects the bank robbery conflict, then you're probably fine. Does that make more sense?
Wendy, third is the most common, but you are seeing more and more multiple firsts these days. Mostly in YA though. Multiple firsts is a tough POV because you really have to get the voices different or the reader loses track of who is who. You do see first/third, but it's rare, and again, hard to do well. Kathleen Duey does it very well in her Resurrection of Magic series. I can't think of any others off the top of my head, but there are sure to be more out there.
Post a Comment