From Fiction University: Enabling third party cookies on your browser could help if you have trouble leaving a comment.

Wednesday, June 29

Three Easy Edits for Better Emotional Descriptions

By Janice Hardy, @Janice_Hardy

The right word can mean the difference between connecting emotionally with a reader and having them forget a character’s name. The more they connect, the more likely it is that they’ll love the story. They more they love the story, the more likely they are to tell all their friends about it and buy the next one. No pressure, but using the wrong words could have a huge impact on a writer’s career.

Since writing a novel is a massive endeavor, we often use placeholder words in a first draft. They quickly capture the emotions we want to convey in the fewest words so we can keep on writing and get our ideas down while they’re still exciting and new.

This is fine for an early draft—we don’t need to be perfect while we’re still figuring it all out—but the trouble comes when we leave those placeholder words in the later drafts. Instead of deepening the emotions we know the characters feel in those moments, we rely on our memory and story knowledge to feel what’s happening in a scene, and wind up with emotionally stunted sentences.

(Here’s more on writing with placeholder words)

I see (and use) three common placeholder words all the time in early drafts:
  • Frowned
  • Smiled
  • Sighed

While there’s nothing inherently wrong with any of them, they frequently wind up in emotionally stunted sentences such as:
  • I frowned.
  • He smiled.
  • She sighed.

These sentences say nothing about how the character feels, but they look like they do because we bring prior knowledge to the sentence. This is doubly dangerous when these sentences are paired with dialogue (and they usually are) because we infuse those spoken words with more emotional impact than is actually making it onto the page.
  • I frowned. “You went to the movies last night?” 
  • He smiled. “That’s sounds great, sure, count me in.” 
  • She sighed. “I never want this moment to end.” 

The reader just sees an emotionally stunted sentence, but we know:
  • I’m frowning because I don’t trust what my best friend is telling me.
  • He smiled because he knows if he doesn’t the villain will realize he’s figured out the truth.
  • She sighed because life really couldn’t get any better and she’s never been so happy.

In some cases, there’s more context in the scene and the emotion is clear and the shorter sentences do indeed convey what we want them to. In others, the only emotional clue is a single word. And there’s always the paragraph that conveys the emotions perfectly and the stunted sentence is redundant.

It’s our job as writers to decide which group each emotionally stunted sentence belongs to.

How to Fix Emotionally Stunted Sentences


Step One: Go through your manuscript and search for frowned, smiled, and sighed.

Step Two: Evaluate each sentence and decide if it’s doing its job or if it’s bringing the passage down.

Step Three: Cut or edit the sentence so it conveys the emotion you know is there.

(Here’s more on describing emotions)

Evaluating Emotionally Stunted Sentences


Identifying weak words is easy—a search is all you need—but deciding what to do once you find them can be trickier. Writing has exceptions to every rule, and the exact sentence can work in one instance and fail in another. As you go through your manuscript, look at each weak word and ask:

If you cut the sentence, is the emotional meaning of the passage clear? If so, you probably don’t need it.

If you cut the sentence, does the meaning of the passage become ambiguous or misleading? If so, you likely need more emotional description in that area. If a passage can become muddy without that one word, that’s a red flag that you’re bringing more emotional to the scene than is actually there. Consider fleshing out the emotions more and turning a “he smiled” into something richer.

(Here’s more on getting what’s in your head onto the page)

Does the rhythm of the passage just read better with it in? If so, leave it in. How the narrative flows is just as important as what it says,and sometimes traditionally “weak writing” is exactly what makes a section sing.

Is it a necessary tag to know who’s speaking?
This one’s a judgment call. There are times when you need a quick tag that doesn’t draw attention or mean anything to help readers keep track of who’s speaking. If taking it out creates confusion, leave it in.

As always in these cases, not every instance of frowned, smiled, or sighed needs to be cut, so use your best judgment. If you’re worried your manuscript feels weak or you’ve gotten feedback about readers not connecting to it, this could be a reason why and a good place to start to fix it.

How often do you write emotionally stunted sentences? What are some of your emotional placeholder words? 


Find out more about setting and description in my book, Fixing Your Setting & Description Problems.
 
Go step-by-step through setting and description-related issues, such as weak world building, heavy infodumping, told prose, awkward stage direction, inconsistent tone and mood, and overwritten descriptions. Learn how to analyze your draft, spot any problems or weak areas, and fix those problems.

With clear and easy-to-understand examples, Fixing Your Setting & Description Problems offers five self-guided workshops that target the common issues that make readers stop reading. It will help you:
  • Choose the right details to bring your setting and world to life
  • Craft strong descriptions without overwriting
  • Determine the right way to include information without infodumping
  • Create compelling emotional layers that reflect the tone and mood of your scenes
  • Fix awkward stage direction and unclear character actions
Fixing Setting & Description Problems starts every workshop with an analysis to pinpoint problem areas and offers multiple revision options in each area. You choose the options that best fit your writing process. It's an easy-to-follow guide to crafting immersive settings and worlds that draw readers into your story and keep them there.

Available in paperback and ebook formats.

Janice Hardy is the award-winning author of the teen fantasy trilogy The Healing Wars, including The Shifter, Blue Fire, and Darkfall from Balzer+Bray/Harper Collins. The Shifter, was chosen for the 2014 list of "Ten Books All Young Georgians Should Read" from the Georgia Center for the Book.

She also writes the Grace Harper urban fantasy series for adults under the name, J.T. Hardy.

When she's not writing novels, she's teaching other writers how to improve their craft. She's the founder of Fiction University and has written multiple books on writing.
Website | Facebook | Twitter | Pinterest | Goodreads | Amazon | Barnes & Noble | iTunes | Indie Bound

11 comments:

  1. I just did a search--I have a lot of smiling going on! I guess I know what I'll be doing today.:) (Just a couple of frowns and sighs)

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is super helpful! I know I use them as part of "showing" (y'know, not saying, it made her sad...) but I probably overuse them. Scowled is one that's been cropping up a lot lately. I'll have to check the others, sigh... ;-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find a lot of those as well. Same with glared.

      Delete
  3. Yeah, my characters nod a lot in my first draft. :-(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have a whole post planned on nodding :) I edited for that in my current WIP just yesterday.

      Delete
  4. Thanks for the nods, smiles, etc. search and delete! Part of revising. Helpful post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! I have a long list of words I always run through as a final clean up.

      Delete
  5. Oh, yeah. My characters smile, frown, grit their teeth, the works. All. The. Time. :-p

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's funny how often we use the same phrase :)

      Delete
  6. Ha ha. I just read through my rough draft and was getting annoyed at how much my character smiled, especially since it was supposed to be a rough time for her. Yeah, serious edits needed. Thanks for the post! :)

    ReplyDelete