Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Is Your Prose Purple?

By Janice Hardy, @Janice_Hardy

The term purple prose has been around as long as I've been writing, and chances are you've heard it to. You'll also hear folks say "the prose is too flowery" or it feels "overwritten." People know it when they see it, but how do you spot it in your own work?

First, let's define them.

Flowery prose and purple prose are basically the same thing. It's text that's so filled with adjectives and adverbs and similes and metaphors that it screams "hey look! I'm fancy writing" and distracts you from the actual story. Often you also need a thesaurus to read it, especially with purple prose.

Overwritten is trying too hard. The idea of the passage is stated, but the writer keeps expanding on it with unnecessary words. If you ever thought to yourself, "Yeah, I get it, he was angry, move on" then you probably read an overwritten passage. It can also be one sentence that takes nine words to say what three can do.

Let's take a basic sentence and do cruel things to it to illustrate this.
Bob swung the shotgun toward the zombie and blew its head off.
This does what a sentence should do. It's not fancy, but it shows the reader what's going on. But let's overwrite it.
Bob lifted the shotgun, the heavy stock smooth against his hand. He took aim, staring down the steel barrel at the zombie lumbering toward him.The sights aligned with the zombie's head -- two dots and a target. He tensed and braced the butt of the shotgun against his shoulder. Holding his breath, he slowly pulled back against the trigger and fired. The shell whizzed through the air and into the zombie's forehead. It's skull exploded, gray brains bursting through the air and splattering on the wall.
Were you ready to shoot Bob yourself by the end of that? The trouble with overwritten prose is that it can feel exciting because stuff is going on. On its own, you may have even liked this paragraph and are wondering why it's a problem. But now think about pages of pages of this type of treatment. As a major climax to a scene, this may not be so bad (I still think it's overwritten), but if everything is described with such minute precision, the story drags. 

But don't think overwritten is only for long passages. You can overwrite a single sentence.
Holding his breath, he slowly pulled back against the trigger and fired.
There are a lot of unnecessary words here, and this is the type of overwriting that will trip most folks up, because it doesn't feel overwritten.But we don't need slowly, or back against. We can even cut trigger.
Holding his breath, he pulled the trigger and fired.

Holding his breath, he fired.

He held his breath and fired.
Now lets take that same paragraph, and color it purple.
Bob elevated the shotgun, the ample stock smooth against his calloused hand. He took aim, gazing down the cobalt-gray steel barrel at the zombie lumbering toward him. The sights aligned with the zombie's cranium--two spheres and pair of red-rimmed eyes, shinning in the incandescent light of the room. He tensed and planted the butt of the shotgun soundly against his shoulder. Breath ceased, a brief moment of calm before the inevitable cacophony the shotgun would surely emit. Slowly, like a leaf drifting on a summer breeze, he drew back against the hair-trigger and released the shell. The shell sailed through the air and submerged deep the zombie's forehead. It's skull ruptured, mushrooming into a firework display of silvery brains bursting through the air.
Egads. This is an exaggerated passage of course, but at some point, every new writer has written something equally bad. (I know I have) But just like the overwritten example, purple prose doesn't have to be a full paragraph. 
Breath ceased, a brief moment of calm before the inevitable cacophony the shotgun would surely emit.
This is still purple, even if the rest of the paragraph was fine. Purple is most often associated with prose that's trying to sound "literary." Stuff that's trying to sound "written" or use too much imagery. 

At this point I'm looking at my example and wondering how to show flowery prose with some guy blowing a zombie's head off, but I'm going to do it anyway, because you don't need sweetness and light to be flowery.
Bob lifted the shotgun, the heavy stock smooth against his hand like a powerful, wooden cannon. He took aim, staring down the glistening steel barrel at the zombie. Death lumbered, step by step, closing the distance as easily as it would steal his life. Bob aligned the sights with the zombie's rotting head, it's weepy red eyes as dead as the still air around them. He tensed and snuggled the butt of the shotgun against his shoulder, holding it tight. He exhaled, his life's breath hissing out of his lungs. Would it be his last breath? he wondered. Fingers slowly pulled back against the sharp trigger and he fired, the blast reverberating off the mildewed walls and deafening him. The shell whizzed through the air fast as lightning and sank deep into the zombie's decayed forehead. It's skull exploded like bloody fireworks, gray brains dancing through the air and splattering on the wall in their own sad Rorschach patten.
Wouldn't you rather face the zombie than read that paragraph again?  Even though this is a gruesome scene, it's trying hard to sound pretty. Imagery is overused, the focus in on what's being said, not what's happening.

And even though I personally love the head exploding like bloody fireworks, that's a flowery line for sure.

Hopefully this clears up what flowery, purple, and overwritten prose means.

13 comments:

  1. Great examples! Bloody fireworks...ewwww :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Has anyone told you lately you totally rock? Thank you sooooooo much for this post. I never understood this term when reading critiques in AW and now I totally, totally get it and yes, there were times reading some of those paras that I wish I was the zombie getting my head shot off :-) Great, great clarification. It all makes sense now.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think the narrator's voice may also play into this. I'm thinking of Scott Westerfeld's Uglies. There are some mighty odd metaphors in there, starting with the opening line that compares dawn to cat vomit. (I read that book probably 2 years ago, and still remember that.) The bloody fireworks might suit your narrative voice for that particular book.

    I've always considered prose "purple" when it was overdone. A light salting of interesting turns of phrase can make a narrator memorable. Too much just tastes salty. And then enough salt for one person is too much for another, but the saltier something is (referring to my metaphor, here!), the fewer people will enjoy it.

    Then again, my mentality about this is likely colored by how I write and speak. My manager has laughed at me for using "endeavor" in a casual e-mail.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi, new follower here with a question.

    I appreciate what you're saying and understand the purple but my question is -- in taking away the overwritten, don't you lose something of the 'voice'.

    Now I'm not one for blowing zombie's away at 10 in the morning but I liked what you did with the paragraphs. I liked the voice I heard as I read. If you had just used, "He aimed the rifle and fired." Yes, we have the action but it's just words, no voice.

    If the whole book was written like that it would probably be five sentences. There was a zombie and a cowboy. The zombie did bad things. The cowboy chased him down. He raised his gun and fired. The zombie died.

    I get what you're trying to say, but where is the line you stop being purple and start being a good writer?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just for future reference, a shell does not fly through the air. The round or the bullet does. The shell stays in the gun or is ejected out the side. A shell is the thing that carries the bullet and the gunpowder. Also, shotguns don't typical fire bullets (there is a thing called a slug that they do fire, but it's uncommon these days). Shotguns fire -- wait for it -- shot. A bunch of pellets or BB's if you will. It tears things up a lot and at short range, yeah, it's going to produce brain fireworks.

    Why yes, I have been called pedantic before -- why do you ask?

    ReplyDelete
  6. These are great examples! Thanks for sharing this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. LOL Eric. I actually wrote it first with bullets, then said "Wait, shotguns don't fire bullets" and changed it. Should have looked it up, but it was 8am.

    As for voice and style vs purple...

    You can have a flowery voice and not go overboard, and you certainly wouldn't want to edit out all the description. A book written as Piedmont Writer described would be just as bad as the examples I gave.

    Perhaps I should have had a "good" paragraph in there to show as an example and not just one line. I'm a sparse writer, but my whole story isn't short, uninteresting sentences. I use imagery same as everyone else. If I were writing a full "regular" paragraph, I also would have used other things besides description.

    It's a very fine line. I exaggerated this on purpose to make a point, but what one person considers purple another may find stylish. Much of it is indeed personal taste, which is what makes it so tough. The general style now is more sparse and not as flowery as it was twenty years ago. And that's not as flowery as it was twenty years before that. Trends change.

    It's also a matter of density. Some of these lines on their own might be fine and fit well with the story and voice of the author, and wouldn't be considered overdone. But using a lot of them in one novel might be too much.

    Bottom line, there is no defined amount of what's "good" vs what's "bad." Like so much of writing, individual preferences will determine that. But if you're getting comments from your critique groups that use these terms, these examples are possible reasons why. It's up to the writer to determine how much (if any) they want to edit. But it IS possible to be descriptive and use a lot of imagery and NOT be purple, flowery, or overwritten.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you, yes, I see your point exactly and agree. I guess that's the paragraph you left out.

    ReplyDelete
  9. My writing improves every time I read your posts. For example, I cut eleven words out of the original of the preceding sentence. :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. It seems there is a fine line between building tension and flowery prose. You touched on using drawn out action in a climax. Let's say the zombie is (was?) Bob's wife. Drawing out the action shows his hesitation in perma-killing her. In fact, I could see the scene being lengthened. Is flowery prose accepted in that scene? Is there a greater tolerance for it? Maybe the smooth gun against his calloused hand echoes an earlier scene where his wife's hand was smooth in his calloused hand. Maybe the cobalt-gray steel matches her eyes. Or is that overwriting?

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think the point, unless I'm wrong that as with all aspects of life, Everything in moderation. I totally get what Kris is saying and it's an excellent point and example. And I do love some of that, BUT too much of it can become extremely annoying to me as a reader and would turn me off or cause me to skip which I have done in books before. Not sure if Purple prose and being overly detailed can sometimes be linked into the same category, but if so, I have definitely had some experiences where I pulled out of the story to focus on minute and insignificant details that tried so hard to paint a picture in my mind that it actually became a strange Picasso type feel to me that I could sorta see, but not quite (if that makes sense). I don't think there's anything wrong with Purple/flowery prose, but if I had to read an entire book written in the style of the examples Janice gave, I'd shut the book and move on to another. Perhaps some people like that stuff, but I'm more about the overall story which I think be delivered equally as well in fewer words and details. JMO

    ReplyDelete
  12. Very true, Melanie. It's all about moderation.

    I got a wonderful submission for Real Life Diagnostics yesterday, and it'll make a perfect example for many of the things folks have brought up. That'll post on Friday.

    Good discussion going on. Writing is so subjective it's important to hear lots of opinions and thoughts on any tough topic.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Kris, I talk some about your question in Friday's post, but I'll answer some here as well.

    If emotional impact can be gained by drawing out a scene, of course draw it out. But only if you also add the emotional aspect to it. Without internalization from Bob to know what he's going through, the scene is just a drawn out scene. Some of the emotional impact will be apparent since the reader got that far in the story, but the emotion is what gives the scene punch. Readers won't care all that much about the fancy imagery without Bob's turmoil. They want to know how he feels, what he's going through, how hard this is for him.

    You can go too far on the emotional side as well, so you want to be careful not to overdo it (that path leads to melodrama), but a good balance between the action, description, and emotion makes for a great scene.

    ReplyDelete