Creating
Conflict
Backstory
Finding a
Critique Group
Writing a
Synopsis
Word
Count
Plotting
In Layers
What Your Query
Says About Your Book
Describing
Your Characters
Point of View
& Characters
The First
250 Words
Passive
Voice

Is Your Writing
Getting Better?
Finding
an Agent
Tips On
Writing Action
Nice Writer
Syndrome?
Red Flag: Words
That Are Trouble
Plotting
The First
Draft
Edit -vs- Revise:
Deathmatch!
Guest Author
Claudia Gray
On Outlining
Guest Author
Kody Keplinger
On Dialog
Guest Author
Cynthia L. Smith
On Process
Guest Author
K.A. Stewart
On Character
Guest Author
Jana DeLeon
On Pantsing
Guest Author
Holly Cupala
On Writing Secrets
Guest Author
Nancy Holzner
On Dialog
Guest Author
Gini Koch
On Process
Guest Author
Vincent H O'Neil
On Research
Online
Resources
Books by
Janice Hardy
The Shifter
by Janice Hardy
Blue Fire
by Janice Hardy
8 Against Reality
inc. Janice Hardy
Diagnostics:
Submit Your Work

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Zip! Crash! Bang! Using Onomatopoeia

Short post today, and I'm going to talk about something kinda controversial, and I'll likely have readers split down the middle over this issue.

Onomatopoeia.

You know, those words that look like what they sound like. Creak. Bang. Swish. I love these guys and I use them all the time in my writing.
Creak

Bob spun around. Was that a zombie or just the wind?
But not everyone likes using sounds this way. One of my beta readers absolutely hates them, but she's accepted the fact that I'm not changing it and now only points them out where they really bug her. And she's usually right.

I find that using onomatopoeia gives me a much closer POV that describing how something sounds. Creak on its own line jumps out just like a creak in the night would. "She heard a creak" just doesn't have the same sense of intimacy. "A board creaked" is better, and I'll use that too, but it still doesn't convey what

Creak

does for me. It's like someone jumping out at you on the page. It emphasizes a sound that really matters to the scene, usually cranking up the tension and giving you that nail-baiting edge of your seat feeling you get in the movies.

And "a board creaked" can sometimes give away too much information. Does our POV really know it's a board? Can they tell what made the sound? Using just the sound gets around all those pesky POV problems.

Of course, if you happen to be like my friend and can't stand onomatopoeia, don't feel you have to use it. There are plenty of great ways to convey sound (just not as cool).

Viva la'onomatopoeia!

14 comments:

Lydia Sharp said...

I am also an onomatopoeia lover, but I don't use it too often. Even so, after seeing it done only once in my writing, a critique buddy of mine actually told me that it felt gimmicky, like a comic book, and she was expecting to see a big POW! whenever a character hit something. So you're right, people either love them or hate them. And the haters are ruthless. ;)

Carradee said...

I don't mind onomatopoeia—as long as it's italicized for clarity *grin*—but I don't think I use it much. I'm far more likely to say "Something creaks" than "Creak". Maybe because everything gets filtered through my first person narrators.

Jaydee Morgan said...

I rarely write it - in fact, I'm one of those people that can't figure out what the sound actually sounds like (it's hopeless, truly). However, I don't mind reading it. I'm fine with either way.

Andrea said...

Interesting post. I don't have anything particularly against it (except when overused), but I think it has to suit the situation in the story. Effective when used sparingly.

Karen Amanda Hooper said...

All I can picture is the old Batman shows. BOOM! POW! BAM!

I think it's like any other rule or style. Use it well and it works. :)

Juliette Wade said...

I enjoyed the post, and I do use onomatopoeia this way sometimes. I did a short post some time ago on the way onomatopoeia works across languages; for the curious, it's at http://talktoyouniverse.blogspot.com/2008/09/bow-wow-boom-smash-onomatopoeia.html

Amanda said...

LOL, I agree. I like onomatopoeia. The only word I really use though is CRASH.

JEM said...

I like the word onomatopoeia, and not just because I still remember how to spell it from third grade spelling classes. However, I do find the one line onomatopoeia to be a little gimmicky IF it isn't used correctly. I think it's one of those devices that has to be wielded by a very good writer; in the hands of a mediocre or bad writer, it's a sure catastrophe.

I love a good grammatical controversy.

atsiko said...

I very rarely use it directly like you. Doesn't really fit the tone of my work. But I can handle it if it's used sparingly.

Natalie Aguirre said...

I don't use it either. But as I read your next book, I'll watch for it. Maybe I'll change my mind.

Vampires and Tofu said...

I don't have anything against it, but then again I'm a comic book fan so I'm used to it...almost a requirement there!

Marisa Birns said...

I agree with several people who mentioned they don't mind it if used sparingly.

I wrote a short story where the main character picked up the phone before the second 'brring'.

Jaleh D said...

I think it depends on the story. I don't use it much in my YA WIP, but my SF WIP is sprinkled with it.

Onomatopoeia works well for present tense or commentary writing. "Creak." followed by "What was that?" or whatever reaction the character has to the sound. It's also good for when a character can hear but not see something happening, whether over the radio or in another room.

Ace said...

I use it.

As you say, creak by itself speaks volumes.