Monday, February 25, 2013

Why Character Arcs (and Growth) Make Readers Care

By Janice Hardy, @Janice_Hardy

Character arcs and plot are like chocolate and peanut butter. Separately they're both good, but together, they're magical. (If you don't like chocolate and/or peanut butter, please substitute your own delicious pairing) When one is missing, readers notice. A book without a plot is boring. A story without a character arc is forgettable.

This was made wonderfully clear when the hubby and I watched So Undercover. It’s basically Miss Congeniality with sorority girls, and the concept was so similar the weaknesses of one (and why) stood out like a palm tree at the North Pole.

So Undercover is about...
Molly, a tough-as-nails, street-smart private investigator who is drafted by the FBI to go undercover in a college sorority, where she quickly discovers she's way out of her element amongst a sisterhood of snooty, high maintenance, materialistic college girls. But Molly accepts the top-secret mission in order to protect the daughter of a key witness in a case against the mob.
Compare this to Miss Congeniality...
FBI Agent Gracie Hart goes undercover as a hopeful eager contestant to be the next Miss United States in order to ferret out a terrorist targeting the event. But Gracie doesn't have a beauty-pageant bone in her body, and it's up to a team of consultants to turn the FBI's Dirty Harriet into a poised beauty .
Two tomboys of the law enforcement vein (FBI vs investigator) enter a world of stereotypically feminine women to prevent a dangerous crime. While undercover, they struggle to fit in. Essentially the same basic fish out of water movie.

So why do I still watch Miss Congeniality and will never watch So Undercover again?

I cared about Sandra Bullock's character, Gracie, in Miss Congeniality.

I didn't care about Miley Cyrus's character, Molly, in So Undercover.

On the surface, they're both decent movies. Good acting, fun writing, good setups. But one movie had a solid character arc (Miss Congeniality), and the other did not (So Undercover) and that made a huge difference in my care factor.

So why did the character arc make such a difference?

If you just look at the characters, you'd think Molly would be more sympathetic:
  • She has a touching backstory--a father with gambling issues, so it's up to her to keep a roof over their heads and food on the table.
  • She's pulled into this case against her will because she needs the money the consulting fee will get her.
  • She's very good at her job.
  • She's funny with a snarky sense of humor.
  • She's a young gal struggling to make something of her life. 

As for Gracie...
  • She' a bit of a mess, pushing the whole "non-girly girl" thing a bit far. She doesn't even comb her hair.
  • She's all alone, and doesn't have anyone depending on her.
  • She's socially awkward.
  • She's a little reckless.

Molly is the girl you'd probably want to hang out with, while Gracie is the one you'd likely slip away from at a party.

Which is one of the reasons you care about Gracie. She has a lot less going for her and lot more to learn. Molly is already solid as a person, even though she has a few rough edges. Gracie has flaws. Big ones.

And that's where the character arc comes in.

(More on creating character arcs here)

Gracie is trying too hard to be one of the boys, and she's forgotten what it's like to be a girl. To her, girls are frilly and weak and lacking in the traits a good FBI agent needs to be successful. So she's handicapping herself by rejecting her own natural talents. To her, women can't be strong. She's denying a part of herself and she's not happy. She's trying to be what she's not.

Molly is strong and capable, but she isn't trying to avoid being a girl. She's tough for sure, rides a motorcycle, is into weapons, but there's never a moment where you feel she's trying to be like the guys around her just to fit in and be taken seriously. Her age is more of a problem for her than her gender. To her, the girly girls are stupid and easily ignored. Her life has problems, but they're aren't of her making.

Tip #1: Flawed characters with something to learn are more sympathetic and have more room for growth

Gracie has to work hard to fit in with the pageant contestants. It takes a lot of effort to get her to look the part, and even more to get her to act it. The more she tries to be what she's always been (the tough FBI agent) the less she fits in and the less capable she is. She has to learn to use her untapped strengths as a woman to do her job well.

Molly gets some new clothes and a makeover and fits right in. She smiles and offers some easy fake quips to hide her tough exterior, but she never becomes anything more than the tough chick in a dress acting like a sorority girl. She uses her investigator skills and is successful without having to change her ways or learn from her experience.

Tip #2: The struggle to change helps endear a character to the reader

(More things to think about when creating character arcs here)

When Gracie decides to stick up for the women in the pageant, she does so because she sees they're aren't what she thought they were. They've changed her viewpoint by their actions.

When Molly decides to stick up for the sorority sisters, she does because...I don't know why. They decided to let her stay there after they wrongly accused her of stealing from them. They never win her over by changing her view, she just gets used to their girly ways.

Tip #3: A change of heart or viewpoint must come from a real change made from a struggle and an experience, not just because plot says so

By the end of the movie, Gracie has learned to embrace her femininity and use it to empower her. She no longer has disdain for the pageant contestants, but respect for what they do and who they are. She's found a new source of strength and her life is better because of this transformation. Including her love life, as she ends up with one of her fellow agents. (Though in a way, this is a bad thing as he didn't notice her until she became beautiful. Shallow dudes do not make good boyfriends. But Gracie is happy and no longer alone, so it's a win in her book)

Molly is pretty much the same person she was when the movie started. She's found a guy, but not because she grew as a person. He liked her for her the whole time, and her pretending to be someone else even came close to driving him away. Had she run into him on the street while doing a PI job, they could have wound up together anyway. She's decided to go to school, but there's never a sense that she's doing it to become a better person or has learned from her experience going undercover. She's just in a position where she no longer has to worry about Dad and this looks like fun. (And Dad is miraculously no longer a problem, which doesn't really make sense. Last week she worried about him, this week she's decided she has to live her own life and can't take care of him anymore, and that's okay.)

Two movies, two women, two similar journeys. One I cared about, one I didn't. Gracie's story left me smiling and happy, cheering for her and thinking what a cute and fun movie it was. Molly's story left me thinking that could have been better. It had all the right pieces but it fell flat.

Tip #4: A character arc that forces a character to face their faults and come out stronger for it is a character readers can root for

(More on creating character, story, and plot arcs here)

Don't let your novels fall flat with weak character arcs. Make sure your protagonist has something to learn from the experiences they go through, and they'll be better off in the end for having done it.And readers will care more that they did.

What's your characters arc? What does he or she learn from their story experience?

18 comments:

  1. Wow, very interesting analysis, Janice. Love it! Perfect examples of why character arcs matter, and why characters that are too "well rounded" from the very beginning have less room to grow, and are thus less engaging.

    I think, though, that the "getting the boy" part is better in Molly's case (from what you described, I haven't seen So Undercover yet). The idea that women need to be feminine to be attractive is quite a theme in Hollywood, and has a negative influence on girls. While in Molly's case the guy loved her for herself, and her acting out of character almost alienated him. That says a lot about the importance of being oneself and not succumbing to archaic gender roles, whereas in Gracie's case she kind of did just that. At least that's what I take from those aspects of the two movies. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'd never even heard of So Undercover before this, though I'd heard of Miss Congeniality. This probably explains why!

    My MC is a tough, needs-neither-help-nor-friends guy, whose ability means that he does need friends if he doesn't want to kill himself. Learning humility is a big part of his character arc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've never seen either movie, but I've heard good things about `Miss Congeniality.' Character arcs are awesome but (I've recently discovered) harder to pull off than they look. Seems I'll be needing to re-read those articles you linked. :)

    I'm glad you asked what my characters arc is, because that means I have to put it in words and that will help me pin it down, which in turn should help me figure out an annoyingly rough scene. (Like I said, character arcs are harder than they sound...)

    Okay. My MC is really loyal to her family to the point where she mistrusts outsiders, and would hide evidence of crimes if a family member would be implicated. She needs to learn that trust isn't blind, and also that sometimes family is the ones you choose rather than the ones you are born with.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I loved the analysis and comparison to the movies. I only saw Miss Congeniality and really liked it. I doubt I'll see the other one for the reasons you listed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've seen some bad plots that were saved by a great character as well. My current character started out as a nice retired cop from Detroit who has to solve a murder in the diner he just opened. But the more I thought about him, the less I liked him. So I decided he needed to have a darker past involving a bit too much booze, and maybe a wife that couldn't handle it any more and had an affair...with his partner. Now I like him. He's got some forgiving to do, of himself, his wife (now dead), and his old partner. It will be tough to do when he finds out his ex-partner is involved with the criminals who killed his wife. When it gets to the point that I cringe, I know I'm getting close.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The book I just finished reading had a great plot, but not so great characters. I couldn't figure out what was wrong until I read your post. Neither the hero or heroine grew. This is definitely something I need to double check with my own WIP. Thanks for the great post.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Underdogs always give me goosebumps when I see them show up in the first few pages of a story. I think, "Ooo. I've got him/her. That's the one I want to win." Because - you're right - they need us to root for them. Great post, Janice.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I watched So Undercover last week, mainly because I am a Miley Cyrus fan, but like you was left feeling disappointed and I wouldn't watch it again, whereas Miss Congeniality is one of my favourite movies, I've watched it more times than I can count.
    you make excellent points here and I can definitely see it.

    I think my character learns that it's OK to ask for help and rely on others. She starts off quite hot headed and determined to succeed on her own, but when she ends up in a group, she finds that each person's skill or talent can help and that it is OK not to be tough and strong all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So insightful and helpful. Off to my writing wiki this goes! Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  10. This analysis is great, especially using two very similar things that end up with very different results because of specific nuances missing from one that plump the other, making it the more likable one.

    And this kind of craft info can be used across the board, which is awesome. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Not much to add as everyone has covered what I was thinking. Just another awesome post, Janice! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Veronica, totally agree. That was the one aspect of So Undercover I actually liked better. Molly didn't need a man to make her life better, whereas Gracie's did (or they gave that impression)

    Rachel, fun arc! So many terrible things you can do to your protag to get him to learn that.

    Chicory, character arcs can be rough for sure. Getting them to line up with the plot arcs can drive me crazy sometimes. Trust and family are great themes, and make great arcs, so you're on the right track. What helps me, is to think about the climax and what the protag has to do to win there. That's usually connected to the growth and the one thing they need to accept to become the person they want/need to be. So maybe your protag needs to trust someone she wouldn't have before?

    Natalie, it's not a bad movie, it just wasn't one that stuck with me. Which was such a shame.

    Ron, love that! "When it gets to the point that I cringe, I know I'm getting close." What a great way to sum that up.

    2unpublishedgirls, most welcome! Hope you find good things in your WIP

    Cat, I'm a SO with you on those underdog stories. Especially sports underdogs. Can't get enough of them.

    Barmybex, good arc, and a valuable lesson as well.

    Carol, good luck!

    Angela, glad it helped. It's amazing how easily subtle things can change a story.

    Tracy, thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Writing kind of lends itself to sadism, doesn't it? :P

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hi Janice
    great blog, I loved the use of the two movies to explore the importance of characters arcs, these things are always easier with examples.
    I thought your first tip was particularly important. It's all-too easy to create an exciting, fun-to-read character from the get go. Creating one with flaws, a real person that you can develop and grow is, as you described, essential to the reader caring.
    As I tend to pants-it most of the time, i've been trying to begin my story and let the character find him or herself. Once I have the basics, i create a timeline, going back into the characters past and finding out what they went through to get to where they are at the beginning of the story. Then, the bit I thought was the beginning simply comes later on, at least in terms of character. I've found this a good way to create someone organically without trying to write flaws in as I go.
    Great stuff,
    cheers
    Mike

    ReplyDelete
  15. Rachael, lol I think it does :) At least on some days. Maybe that's why we do such evil things to our characters? Payback!

    Michael, thanks! Your process sounds like a nice mix of both sides. Allows for a lot of freedom to just see where the story goes and who the characters are.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This is a great post, and timely as I've been increasingly wondering if my main character is interesting enough. I still haven't figured it out, but your post will give me food for thought. :)

    I'll try to describe my character arc, but I agree with the above poster -- it's really hard. :)

    Ok -- she's a servant girl and an orphan, raised by her employer to be quiet and submissive. An opportunity arises for her to find out about her parents, which causes her to leave all that is familiar as she faces an unknown world. Over time, she learns to find her own voice and the inner strength she never knew she had.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I am jumping in to this blog way late in the game, just ran across it while clicking though another blog. Here is my question. My protagonist is trying to keep her daughter out of prison by declaring her insane, incompetent to stand trial, but my ending had her being the opposite of what the reader would have thought. Does the protagonist have to grow to be a better person in the end, or is it okay to surprise the heck out of everybody by making her be the deceitful one in the end?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Joanne, sorry for the delayed reply, I was out of town at a conference :) No, the protagonist doesn't have to grow into a better person. They typically change over the course of the novel, but always. You could certainly have her turn out to be deceitful and surprise readers.

    A word of caution there however...

    Endings should be satisfying to the reader, so if a character they've been rooting for and trusting all book suddenly becomes the bad guy who has lied to them for 400 pages, will they enjoy that twist or feel tricked by the author?

    If that twist confirms something readers have suspected all along, then it'll probably work great. If readers are blindsided, they'll likely be unhappy.

    ReplyDelete