I read a review of The Shifter recently that had a good observation in it. The reviewer remarked that they liked the tropical setting I set up in the beginning of the story, but that they felt is faded as the novel went on and they would have liked to have seen that setting continue. These kinds of comments are great no matter where they come from, because this is a simple thing to fix that can make a book better.
Description is my least favorite things to write. I don't like heavy description in other books (I skim it a lot) and I avoid it in mine. My crit groups frequently ask me to add more because they can't get a solid sense of place yet. My early drafts are always setting light.
In my mind, I set up the world and the tropical setting right away and figured the reader would just remember. I'm sure there are smaller details all thorough the book to reinforce the setting, but I've no doubts that I didn't do enough to make this reviewer happy. (and for the record, they liked the book overall, this was just a minor thing). But I could have easily added a few more lines here and there to keep my world fleshed out to the end. You can be sure that for Shifter 3, I'll be paying attention to this.
As you write your novels and flesh out your worlds, no matter if they're modern day New York or the village of Hineta, you might think about your setting more.
Do you continue to develop your world to the end, or does it fade out?
It can be hard to keep a setting going, because once you've used the perfect details to show it, you can't just keep using those details or it'll feel repetitious. But the world is a big place, so there are probably other details that can reinforce your world and setting and still reveal something new about the place. This is especially true in science fiction or fantasy where the world is so much of the draw.
Do you spend too much time on the setting?
Describing every little detail can get tedious, especially if it doesn't tell the reader anything new. Are you treating every scene as if the reader had never seen it before, or building off of what you've already done?
Does the POV character's view change, so that they see the same world in a new way?
There are opportunities here to set the scene in a new way. People's opinions of a place change as they change or learn new things. What seemed like an intimidating and stand offish village might become a safe haven with people who watch out for each other once you get to know them.
Getting lost in a book in one of my favorites things, and when the world is real and wonderful I enjoy it even more. I know I'm going to make sure I keep up my end from now on.

































6 comments:
Excellent points--and not something you normally come across in the how-to advice. Love the reminder that setting changes with the character's arc!
Hope you don't mind if we include this in Friday's round-up of best articles for writers.
Martina
I'm a lot like you, Janice - lean with the descriptions. It is something I have to put forth much effort into during later drafts of a story. However, I'm almost finished reading THE SHIFTER, and I never once thought the setting wasn't described well. But perhaps I just don't need too much of a nudge before my imagination simply fills in the gaps. I'm having no trouble at all picturing the scenes, and that was actually something I was going to specifically highlight in my upcoming review.
*shrugs* Just another example of how we're all different, as readers *and* writers. :)
I'm the same way. I almost don't even touch the setting. I wrote my first novel last year and it takes place almost exclusively in the dream world (but also the shadow realm) ... I do describe those cause they're different from our world. With my current WIP, it's our world. There's paranormal stuff going on, but it's our world. So, I think other than my main character's bedroom, the forest behind his house, his school and his grandmother's kitchen, there's close to no description.
i'm getting ready to start reading the shifter; so, this is something i can look out for ... to see how you handle setting.
I'm glad I'm not alone in not loving descriptions. I get pushed by my critique group too to describe more. I also am starting to struggle in my second book with descriptions of made up creatures, magical things, to describe them enough without putting in too much backstory.
I always thought I was a bit weird for being a sci fi/fantasy writer who didn't like description, but I meet lots of folks now who feel the same way (yay!). Trends change I guess, and the days of heavy word painting might be over. (more yay!). I think it helps a lot to think of setting as something that lets us accomplish another writing goal instead of just setting as itself. It's a tool, not just a necessary evil. That's how I try to approach it.
I like reading evocative descriptions that flow with the rest of the story. But I hate writing description, because I'm so prosaic. When I try to describe things, they sound dry and boring. So, for now, I just write enough about setting for me to know where the characters are and leave the rest for later drafts.
Post a Comment