Creating
Conflict
Backstory
Finding a
Critique Group
Writing a
Synopsis
Word
Count
Plotting
In Layers
What Your Query
Says About Your Book
Describing
Your Characters
Point of View
& Characters
The First
250 Words
Passive
Voice

Is Your Writing
Getting Better?
Finding
an Agent
Tips On
Writing Action
Nice Writer
Syndrome?
Red Flag: Words
That Are Trouble
Plotting
The First
Draft
Edit -vs- Revise:
Deathmatch!
Guest Author
Claudia Gray
On Outlining
Guest Author
Kody Keplinger
On Dialog
Guest Author
Cynthia L. Smith
On Process
Guest Author
K.A. Stewart
On Character
Guest Author
Jana DeLeon
On Pantsing
Guest Author
Holly Cupala
On Writing Secrets
Guest Author
Nancy Holzner
On Dialog
Guest Author
Gini Koch
On Process
Guest Author
Vincent H O'Neil
On Research
Online
Resources
Books by
Janice Hardy
The Shifter
by Janice Hardy
Blue Fire
by Janice Hardy
8 Against Reality
inc. Janice Hardy
Diagnostics:
Submit Your Work

Friday, February 19, 2010

The End is -- Shoot, Too Soon: What to Do With a Chapter That's Too Short

We all know how critical it is to have the right chapter end. You want something unexpected, something that grabs the reader's attention and makes them desperate to turn the page. We usually recognize it when we reach it in our writing.

But what happens when you hit that perfect ending, and it's only halfway through what your target chapter size is?

For some folks this is a no brainer, because they'll just end the chapter there. But others prefer a general consistency of chapter length. To help figure out which way to go, here are a few options:

1. Look to see how you can flesh out the chapter so it ends closer to your target word count.
Pros: The chapter is the size you intended. You get to develop areas you might not have done if you hadn't been pressed to take another look.
Cons: You might be adding stuff just to add.

Sometimes it's easy to tell when you're just adding, because the additions are trivial. More details, empty dialog, cute little jokes or stuff that doesn't do anything to help the book. It just drags the scene out. Try going back and taking a too-short scene and look for ways you could make it a little bit tougher or a little more interesting to reach that target word count.

2. Use that as a scene ending and keep going.
Pros: You don't have to do anything.
Cons: The chapter ending might not be nearly as good, or there might not be a good spot to end it in the words required.

When this happens, just write the story as it should be told and let the word count fall where it may. Most of the time you can go back after and restructure a few chapters so they fit and flow better. You can also add more (or cut some) to a previous chapter and shift a few things around.

3. Don't end, just keep writing.
Pros: You don't have to do anything and there's good tension in the middle of the chapter to keep things moving.
Cons: The chapter often feels off because it reads as if it should have ended there and doesn't.

This might not bother a reader since they didn't know you meant to end it there and couldn't. But something might still feel off because everything builds toward that moment, and then whoops, it peaks and keeps going. Try looking for ways to tweak it and let that great moment give the scene a bump in tension or stakes, and end later with an even better punch.

4. Let the chapter end where it ends.
Pros: You don't have to do anything.
Cons: You have a short chapter.

If you feel really, really strongly that this is the perfect ending, leave it short. You never know how things will change during revisions, and you might be able to flesh out that chapter with something that happens later.

Not everyone will be sensitive to where a chapter ends (I know some writers who don't even break the novel into chapters until it's done), so if you don't care how many words each chapter has, don't sweat it. And certainly don't feel you need to start worrying just because I mentioned it. But if you do care, and it does bug you when the chapters don't fall out as planned, these tips might help you hit those goals.

Do you care what size your chapters are? Do you worry if one is too long or too short?

11 comments:

Jen said...

Excellent post! There are no real rules, I suppose it's what works best for each writer, but I am with you, I like a little structure therefore I like my chapters to be around the same as one another, that doesn't mean that I don't want the chapter to end has a bit of a cliffhanger, I just need to learn to adjust the body of the chapter instead!

Tara McClendon said...

Great post and tips. I like to aim for some consistency in the length, but I also make sure I'm not adding fluff.

atsiko said...

As a reader, I was never really bothered by shorter chapters, and it doesn't really seem to affect me as a writer, either. I don’t think there’s a set way to deal with this sort of thing, since the variance in reader attitudes is so large. Personally, I prefer a scene/chapter to stop where it stops. If a writer hits that point and keeps going, it might annoy me because it feels like they’re adding fluff, or trying to hard to fit an outline. Considering how often some writers end up with high word counts, ending where it ends is a good way to reduce that problem. I like long books, but I want them to be long because that’s what the story needs, not to meet some artificial quota per chapter or something.

I think it really depends on what your goal is with chapters, though. Most readers and writers I’ve seen seem to see it as mostly a convenient structure to leave off. It’s been endlessly argued whether it’s better to leave off in a lull or a gale. I tend to like lulls better, because otherwise I might have trouble putting the book down. When I read later than I should, I tend to plow through ‘til the next chapter. That extra white space gives me permission to stop.

As far as pacing goes, chapters don’t affect me much. They only approximate the pacing insofar as chapter breaks tend to be inserted in a lull or gale in terms of tension, so I think it’s better to structure the chapters around the pacing, rather than structure the pacing around the chapters.

TerryLynnJohnson said...

this is quite timely for me as I'm currently looking at that with my editor. I had a few chapters twice the length of most, and debated on splitting them in two for consistency.
When I did it, I found I had to rewrite the endings to make them hang a bit. I think it worked because you add a little more suspence and question which is usually a good thing.

I so enjoy your blog.

Janice Hardy said...

Thanks, all!

Jen, there really are no rules. I have friends who write in ways that would drive me crazy, and they can't understand how I write the way I do, LOL. But it all works for each of us. I tried all kinds of things until I found what worked for me.

Atsiko, I like to mix lulls and gales myself. I think always doing one or the others gets repetitive after a while. And even when there's a lull, I do try to end on something enticing to keep readers reading. A quieter mystery posed, or a hint or secret. I don't *want* readers putting the book down, even though I've stayed up way too late reading myself more than once. But those are always the books I wind up telling everyone about how good they were.

I agree about structuring the chapters around the pacing, but I find that my writing style (and how I pace) tends to sync up with my chapter size. Most times, when I end up short (or long) there's something funky going on I need to address. I think I chose this chapter size because that's what I naturally write to when I'm building a scene or a series of scenes to an event. I usually have scenes of 500, 1000 and 1500 words (those get mixed up, it's not always that format), so there are these waves of tension. It wasn't anything I consciously planned, just something I've been noticing.

Terrance Foxxe said...

Chapters end precisely when they mean to end, they are neither too long, nor too short. And with that in mind I let them end when they need to, teasing the reader on.

http://terrancefoxxe.blogspot.com/

atsiko said...

Janice,

In my experience, a book being put down is not as dangerous as the writerly mythos makes it out to be. If I really don't want to finish a book, I put it away, not down. If I'm multi-tasking, I might put the book down overy other minute. It's a real pain when I miss something important because I didn't want to stop reading. Or look up at a good break to see the sun rising. (I need my beauty sleep.)

Janice Hardy said...

Ah, see I'm just the opposite. The books I don't reluctantly put down might sit there for a long time. I've let books sit and picked up new ones (and read them in one sitting) before I've gone back. The longer a book sits, the less chance of me finishing it. The ones that kept me up at night or made me miss something are the ones I tell folks about the most.

Everyone's different of course, but I want there to always be something hanging, even in a lull, to bring the reader back, because I know that's what keeps *me* reading.

I do, however, have a separate to read pile I keep on my nightstand for night time reading. Those are always books that are light and fluffy and fun and don't have the "must read all now" endings. Those I read when I can't sleep or just want to wind down, and don't want to get sucked into a long book.

What kind of ending depends a lot of the genre, now that I think about it. I don't expect my chick lit stuff to keep me reading all night, but I do want my thrillers to do it.

atsiko said...

I only occasionally leaves books sitting for a long time.

This would be so much easier if all readers were the same.
(In habits, not genre.)

Janice Hardy said...

It would, but then think of all the great books that would never have been published. The variety is what makes it all work :)

Heather Day Gilbert said...

I think shorter chapters can be extremely effective, IF they're sprinkled evenly throughout the book (for instance, a POV change). However, I do aim for consistency in chapter length. Sometimes there can be two "cliffhangers" in a chapter, so you just write past the first one into that second, final hook.