Edit, No...Rewrite, Nah...Revisions. Yeah, That's It. Handling Revisions.

When you get back a critique, how do you incorporate the feedback?

Everyone has the own way, but when faced with pages of information and comments, sometimes it's hard to know where to start. Since I'm sitting here with six -- yes six -- great critiques for Shifter 2, I thought I'd share how I go about revising after a critique.

First thing I do is read them. Sounds crazy, right? But I read them with no expectations. I'm not trying to see if anyone liked the book, I just want to know what they thought. I make no judgments here. If anything pops up that seems totally whacked, I just let it slide on by.

Once I've read them all, I ask my critiquers any questions I might have. Sometimes I'll need clarification on a point, or someone will say something that really hits me and I'll want them to elaborate. After that, I let the critique sit for a few days.

The sitting is a pretty important aspect. We all have great hopes and dreams for our work, so any negative comment can give us a knee-jerk reaction and the need to justify why we did something. It's not uncommon to think, "They're just missing the point"at this stage. (For the record, they usually aren't)

After a few days, I go back and read the crits again, this time with an eye for what the problems are. I open a new file and take notes on things I agree with and plan to fix. I note any suggestions made I think would work.

Then I look at the stuff that seemed to miss the point. I try to understand why the comment was made. Was the problem really what they said it was, or did this moment not work because I failed somewhere else, and this is when that error becomes clear? This is the hardest type of comment to deal with, because sometimes it's a legitimate comment, and sometimes it really is the critiquer missing the point.

How can you tell the difference?

Well, if more than one person tells me the same thing, chances are it's a problem.

If I can see what the person is talking about, but disagree, chances are it's a problem, but not the problem they think it is. I probably didn't set it up correctly and they expected something else by the time they got to this moment.

If I can't figure out what they're talking about, and asking yields no further understanding, it's probably just them.

If I understand what they're talking about, but it's something that is addressed in the story, I go back and tweak it a little to make sure it's clear. It might be just them, but it's possible others could benefit from a little more clarification.

Next comes figuring out what needs to be fixed, using the notes I took on the larger issues. I copy those notes in the story file itself (in a different color of course), elaborating where needed. Often, I add a summary paragraph or two at the start of the chapter the changes need to occur in. I adjust my outline and chapter summaries. I cut out the old stuff I know is getting deleted (such as a chapter or scene). I basically prep for the heavy duty rewriting.

Once all the big stuff is marked down and I know the macro level issues, I move on to the line edits. I go critique by critique and fix anything that's easy (a typo, an odd word choice, an extra clause). All the other comments I cut and past into my main document in the same places the critiquer made them.

Finally, I start reading on page one, making the changes as I come to them. If I encounter anything that requires more thought or planning, I highlight it in yellow and move on. My goal here is to make as many edits as I can without getting bogged down. After the easy stuff is done, I can focus on the harder rewrites and make sure they fit the new story lines.

After all that is finished, I let the manuscript sit for a week or two (unless I'm on a deadline, like now, then I jump right in). Then I go back and read it yet again. I fix anything that pops out at me. I keep doing this until the manuscript is clean. I consider it clean when I tweak a word here and there as I read, but nothing more.

If the changes were major, I'll ask for more critiques and go through the whole process again. It takes work, but I've found it to be an effective way to revise.

And not nearly as messy as dealing with Post-its.