tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3901370917824739259.post1188478914278253637..comments2024-03-27T10:02:56.747-04:00Comments on Fiction University: Structure and Outlining Janice Hardyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02356672149097741248noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3901370917824739259.post-25339584145337282062018-04-20T07:43:25.962-04:002018-04-20T07:43:25.962-04:00Yes, that's correct. I just didn't use tha...Yes, that's correct. I just didn't use that specific example in my answer. :) Janice Hardyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02356672149097741248noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3901370917824739259.post-72899261909089388912018-04-19T22:38:25.036-04:002018-04-19T22:38:25.036-04:00No. It is, to my understanding, because they are w...No. It is, to my understanding, because they are writing their stories by the "seat of their pants", (i.e. no outlines or planning), so therefore they are called PANTsers. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3901370917824739259.post-80893925913881490762015-10-07T06:27:00.444-04:002015-10-07T06:27:00.444-04:00I'm not sure which article you're referrin...I'm not sure which article you're referring to, but pantser is a common term for writers who don't like to outline or plan. Planster is a term one guest author used to describe herself as being in the middle between a outliner and pantser. So, probably yes, the repeat of pantser is intentional since it refers to a type of writer and is mentioned in multiple articles. Janice Hardyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02356672149097741248noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3901370917824739259.post-44953780373319663872015-10-06T23:52:29.902-04:002015-10-06T23:52:29.902-04:00Is the repeated use of "Pantser" intenti...Is the repeated use of "Pantser" intentional, or, is it intended to be "Planster" as in the linked articles?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com